International Humanitarian Law and National Security in the Light of Impact-Oriented Operations Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student of Public International Law, Department of Law, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of International Law, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran, (Corresponding Author

3 Associate Professor, Department of International Law, National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The evolution in international security theories causes changes in international legal-normative foundations and this causes different levels from interpretation to change and repeal of laws, which at least creates a different interpretation and rather different from the previous interpretations. And the maximum is the copying of previous laws or changes in the meaning of common laws, therefore it requires that the theories proposed in the field of international security be studied in order to evaluate the ratio of theories and laws, their mutual influence and impact on each other. and the formation of new processes of norming and legislation in the international environment should be understood correctly. Based on this, the main question of this research is that what consequences does the theory of impact-oriented operations create in the realization and application of international humanitarian rights and, consequently, in guaranteeing the national security of areas involved in armed conflicts? To answer this question, a descriptive-analytical method was used, and the summary result of this research is that the theory of influence-oriented operations, through overcoming and imposing its will on international law, intends to affect the process of legislation in the international arena and This will ultimately endanger the flow of security and peace both in the national and international spheres.

Keywords

References

  1. جلیلی قاسم آقا، امید، سیاست‌گذاری: مفاهیم، الگوها و فرآیندها، مجله رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، سال دوم، شماره 4، بهار1397.
  2. خوش آید ،حمید ،برندگان و بازندگان جنگ یمن به روایت آمار، شورای راهبردی روابط خارجی، 1399.
  3. دیترفلک،ترجمه سید قاسم زمانی و دیگران،کمیته ملی حقوق بشردوستانه،موسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های حقوقی،شهردانش،تهران،1378.
  4. ذوالعین، پرویز،(1395)، مبانی حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، تهران،دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین‌المللی.
  5. راجرز، آنتونی، مالرب،پل،قواعد کاربردی حقوق مخاصمات مسلحانه،ترجمه کمیته ملی حقوق بشردوستانه،تهران، موسسه انتشارات امیرکبیر،1387.
  6. زد جوباگی، ترجمه سهراب سوری، عملیات تأثیر محور، دانشکده و پژوهشکده فرماندهی و ستاد و علوم دفاعی، مرکز مطالعات دفاعی و امنیت ملی، 1385.
  7. شفیعی سیف‌آبادی، محسن، تبیین پروژه ترور دانشمندان هسته‌ای و آینده‌پژوهی اقدامات متقابل ایران، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حفاظتی- امنیتی دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، سال نهم، شماره34، تابستان 1399.
  8. ضیایی بیگدل، محمدرضا، حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه،تهران،گنج دانش،چاپ چهارم، 1396.
  9. مجید زحمتکش و علیرضا آرش پور، راهکارهای حمایتی حقوق بین‌الملل عرفی از اموال فرهنگی در زمان مخاصمات مسلحانه، مجله مطالعات حقوقی دانشگاه شیراز، دوره نهم، شماره اول، بهار1396.
  10. نامدار، سعید، حملات سایبری و حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چاپ اول، تهران، موسسه آموزشی و تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی، 1398.
  11. نژندی منش، هیبت الله، افروغ، محمد، حمایت از اموال فرهنگی در هنگام مخاصمات مسلحانه: بررسی رویه دادگاه کیفری بین‌المللی یوگسلاوی سابق، مجله پژوهش‌های حقوقی (علمی ـ ترویجی )، شماره 20، نیمسال دوم 1399 .
  12. نوروزی ، محمدتقی،فرهنگ امنیتی- دفاعی،تهران،مرکز مطالعات و پژوهش‌های مدیریت،1385 .
  13. همایون، محمدهادی، جعفری هفتخوانی، نادر، درآمدی برمفهوم و روش سیاست‌گذاری فرهنگی، درس هایی برای سیاست‌گذاران، اندیشه مدیریت، سال دوم، شماره دوم، پاییز و زمستان 1378.

14- Alexander,Amanda, A Short History of International Humanitarian Law, The European Journal of International Law Vol. 26 no. 1 EJIL (2015), Vol. 26 No. 1, The Author, 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EJIL Ltd. 

15- ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW, What is International Humanitarian Law?,Icrc, 07/2004

16- Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field. Geneva, 22 August 1864

17- Firchow , Pamina Maria, “New” War Theory: Does the Case of Colombia Apply?, , Peace, Conflict and Development: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 7, July( 2005)

18- Heike Krieger& Jonas Püschmann,Law-Making and Legitimacy in International Humanitarian Law,Published by Edward Elgar uk(2021)   

19- HENDERSON, ERROL A,“NEW WARS” AND RUMORS OF “NEW WARS”, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA, International Interactions, (2002)

20- Human Rights CouncilTwenty-eighth session,Agenda items 2,Annual report of the United Nations High Commissionerfor Human Rights and reports of the Office of theHigh Commissioner and the Secretary-GeneralReport of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the human rights situation in Iraq in the light of abuses committed by the so-called Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant and associated groups,

21- INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND THE CHALLENGES OF CONTEMPORARY ARMED CONFLICTS, RECOMMITTING TO PROTECTION IN ARMED CONFLICT ON THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS, International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland(2019)

22- International Law Association Study Group on the Conduct of Hostilities in the 21st Century, The Conduct of Hostilities and International Humanitarian Law: Challenges of 21st Century Warfare, Published by the Stockton Center for the Study of International Law, Volume 93,(2017)

23- Joint Publication 1, ( 2017), Doctrin for the Armed Forces of the united ststes.25 ,march, 2013.Incorporating chang1. 12, JULY

24- Lawrence Hill&Cawthorne, Rights under International Humanitarian Law, The European Journal of International Law Vol. 28 no. 4 EJIL (2017), Vol. 28 No. 4, The Author(s), 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EJIL Ltd.

25-Letter dated 22 January 2021 from the Panel of Experts on Yemen addressed to the President of the Security Council

26- Levy, Jack S ,THEORIES OF WAR AND PEACE , Columbia University Fall( 2018 )

27- MatthewLiao & Massimo Renzo, Philosophical Foundations of HumanRights, OXFORD UNIEERCITY PRESS ,(2015),

28- Melzer, Nils, INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW A COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION, International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland, ICRC, November( 2019)

29- Mijalković, Saša & Blagojević, Dušan, THE BASIS OF NATIONAL SECURITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies, Belgrade, January (2014)

30- Paul K. Davis, Effects-Based OperationsA Grand Challenge for the Analytical Community, Published by RAND,(2001)

18- Pejic,Jelena, The protective scope of Common Article 3: more than meets the eye, reveiwof the International Red Cross, SELECTED ARTICLE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW, Volume 93 Number 881 March (2011)

31- Rigterink Anouk,,New Wars in Numbers: an empirical test of the ‘new war’ thesis,erc,International Development(2014)

32-Zoltan Jobbagy-Budapest, Approaches to Effects-Based Operations: A Retrospective Analysis of Addressing Causality in War,(2012)

33-https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl

34-https://www.businessinsider.com/trump

35-https://www.mashreghnews.ir/

36-https://www.scfr.ir/fa/300/30101/131328

37-https://www.598.ir/fa/news/481517

protectiv & security researches
Volume 11, Issue 41 - Serial Number 41
January 2023
Pages 151-178

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics