Examining the knowledge dimension in organizational architecture patterns (case study: security organizations)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Ph.D. student in National Security at Supreme National Defense University, member of scientific board at Imam Hossein (PBUH) Comprehensive University

Abstract

Regardless of the dimensions and components of any organizational architecturalpattern, the academic framework that is characterized by the knowledge ofthis domain as an important process and perspective, is necessary to completeany organizational architectural pattern. Indigenizing scientific patterns does notmean to backtrack on its scientific principles. Knowledge dimension of architectureas the scientific form of organizational architecture prevents the patternfrom losing its effectiveness and provides a basis for measuring scientific efficiencyof the pattern. In security organizations such as other organizations, theexistence of an organizational architectural pattern is essential and knowledgedimension is regarded as one of the main and regulatory elements of it. This isan applied- developmental study and employs quantitative approach and librarycollection tools and questionnaire (with content validity and Cronbach’s alphaof. /82). The purpose of the study is to determine the place of scientific principlesof organizational architecture in security organizations, which indicates that inthese organizations, knowledge dimension as part of organizational architecturalpatterns is equal to the common frameworks of organizational architectureand consist of the components of elements and concepts, functions, requirements,products and direction makers. A common understanding in the field ofbases and concepts is more important than other components. The scientific dimensionof architecture requires optimal performance of cognitive, supervisoryand executive functions of security organizations and plays a role in providingthe security of security authorities.

Keywords


1. Aier stephan,Ekstedt mathias,Matthes floran, Proper erik, Sanz jorje, «Trends in enterprise architecture research and practice-Driven reseach on enterprise transformation«.springer,2012,p229
2. Department of Defense,(1997),C4ISR Architecture Framework, Version 2,section2,p7
3. Department of Defense, (2015), DoD Architecture Framework Architectural Data and Models,Version 2.02, Volume II, Section3
4. J.E. Varajao, M.M.Cruz-Chunha, (2015),« Improving Organizational Effectiveness with Enterprise Information Systems«, published in the United States America, IGI Global.
5. George Rebovich, Jr., Brian E. White, (2011), « Enterprise Systems Engineering: Advances in the Theory and Practice «, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
6. Minoli,D. ,(2008) .Enterprise Architecture A to Z: Frameworks, Business Process Modeling,SOA,and Infrastructure Technology. Londn:Taylor&Francis Group,LLC
7. Rood,M.A, (1994),«Enterprise Architecture :Definition,Content,and Utility«, IEEE Trans
8. Scott A. Bernard ,(2010), «The sterstegic use of enterprise architecture«,part1
9. Veasey, P.W. «Use of enterprise architectures in managing strategic change  Business Process«, Management Journal, (2001), 7(5): 420-436.